Sprouts SIT Exposes Shah Rukh Khan Family’s Land Controversy
• Suhana Khan in Alibaug Land Scam
• No-Sale Clause Violated, SIT Exposes Deal
• Officials Accused of Collusion and Fraud
Unmesh Gujarathi
Sprouts News Exclusive
Contact: +91 9322755098
- Sprouts SIT Exposes Shah Rukh Khan Family’s Land Controversy
- Suhana Khan Entangled in ₹12.91 Crore Alibaug Land Scam
- Alibaug Land Case: What Is the Controversy?
- Allegations of Collusion and Revenue Loss
- Sprouts News SIT Investigation and Demands
- Wider Implications for Land Governance in Maharashtra
- Sprouts SIT Concludes Probe
The Sprouts News Special Investigation Team (SIT) has uncovered a major land fraud involving Bollywood actor Shah Rukh Khan’s daughter, Suhana Khan. She faces legal scrutiny over a ₹12.91 crore Alibaug land deal, where a government-owned Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) plot, bound by strict “no-sale” conditions, was allegedly sold illegally. The Sprouts SIT’s findings reveal significant revenue loss, official collusion, and demand criminal prosecution.
Click Here To Download the News Attachment
Suhana Khan Entangled in ₹12.91 Crore Alibaug Land Scam
Alibaug, Maharashtra – A major controversy has erupted over the alleged illegal sale of government-owned land in the CRZ area of Thal, Alibaug, involving Bollywood superstar Shah Rukh Khan’s daughter, Suhana Khan. Documents reviewed by the Sprouts News Special Investigation Team (SIT) reveal that a prime plot valued at ₹12.91 crore was sold in violation of strict government conditions, sparking public outrage and demands for immediate state intervention.
Alibaug Land Case: What Is the Controversy?
The disputed land, Survey No. 345/2, measuring 0.60.70 hectares in Thal, Alibaug, was originally allotted in 1968 for cultivation under a “non-sale” clause. The government had explicitly restricted any transfer, sale, or mortgage without prior approval from the District Collector.
However, in June 2023, heirs of the original allottee—Anjali, Rekha, and Priya Khote—allegedly executed a registered agreement to sell the land to Suhana Khan for ₹12.91 crore. Crucially, this was done without the Collector’s approval, making the deal prima facie illegal. According to Adv. Vivek Dattatrey Thakur, member of Sprouts Special Investigation Team and legal advisor to the Sprouts SIT, who has pursued the case for two years, the transaction constitutes a blatant breach of legal conditions and state revenue laws.
Allegations of Collusion and Revenue Loss
The complaint alleges collusion between revenue officers, sub-registrars, and local officials. Despite the land being within the CRZ zone and having records of unauthorized constructions (House Nos. 1770, 1771, and 367), then Circle Officer R.N. Mandhre submitted a false report claiming “no structures exist” on the land.
Adv. Thakur further alleges that one of the panch witnesses in the transaction has direct links to Shah Rukh Khan’s company, raising suspicions of undue influence. As a result, the state allegedly suffered massive revenue losses, as ₹12.91 crore changed hands without mandatory government premiums or approvals.
Legal Analysis: Why the Deal May Collapse
1. Land Status & Conditions – Classified as Class-2 land, allotted for agricultural use under the 1968 Collector’s order. Explicitly barred from sale or transfer without prior approval.
2. Nature of Agreement – A registered “Agreement to Sale” was executed on 31 May / 1 June 2023. While such agreements do not transfer final ownership, the exchange of consideration (₹12.91 crore) constitutes a de facto transfer attempt, violating conditions.
3. CRZ Violation – The land lies in CRZ-I. Unauthorized structures exist, but official reports deny this, suggesting possible fabrication.
4. Fraudulent Documentation – Allegations that officers knowingly filed false inspection reports.
5. Revenue Evasion – The state government was deprived of unearned income (nazrana) and conversion fees.
If proven, this makes the agreement voidable and subject to cancellation under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, and CRZ Notification rules.
Sprouts News SIT Investigation and Demands
The Sprouts News Special Investigation Team (SIT) has recommended:
· Immediate cancellation of the sale agreement and related documents.
· Repossession of the land by the state without compensation.
· Criminal prosecution under IPC Sections 420, 465, 471, and 120B for fraud, forgery, and conspiracy.
· Disciplinary action against revenue officers and sub-registrars involved in collusion.
The Sprouts SIT insists that delays in government action only embolden land mafias and high-profile buyers. The matter is now expected to escalate politically, given the celebrity family’s involvement.
Also Read: India Suspends Postal Parcels to USA Amid Duty‑Rule Turmoil.
Wider Implications for Land Governance in Maharashtra
This case highlights recurring patterns in Maharashtra’s coastal districts where prime land is acquired through loopholes, benami transactions, and collusion between bureaucrats and influential buyers. Experts warn that such transactions not only erode public trust but also deprive the exchequer of hundreds of crores in potential revenue.
The controversy has already triggered political ripples, with opposition leaders demanding transparency in CRZ land monitoring. If the allegations hold, the Alibaug case could become a precedent-setting legal battle redefining land governance in sensitive zones.
Sprouts SIT Concludes Probe
Based on documents, legal provisions, and the complaint filed, the ₹12.91 crore land deal appears to stand on shaky legal ground. With clear evidence of violation of the 1968 order and possible CRZ breaches, state authorities are under pressure to act swiftly.
If enforced, the outcome could be three-fold:
· Cancellation of Suhana Khan’s agreement,
· Return of the land to the state, and
· Criminal charges against the Khote family, Suhana Khan, and complicit officials.
The Sprouts News Special Investigation Team (SIT) continues to track the case closely under the editorial leadership of Unmesh Gujarathi, ensuring that questions of legality, governance, and accountability remain in the public spotlight.