ED Questions Muthoot Finance Group MD Over Investor Fraud, Fund Diversion.

Muthoot Group MD George Alexander Questioned by ED in Investor Fraud Money Laundering Case

• The Alleged Investor Fraud Scheme

• The Srei Equipment Finance Link & Fund Diversion

• ED’s Money Laundering Investigation Intensifies

• Fallout and Impact on Muthoot Finance Group’s Reputation

The Enforcement Directorate has questioned Muthoot Group MD George Alexander in a widening money laundering investigation. The probe involves allegations of investor fraud and fund diversion to Srei Equipment Finance. Multiple FIRs filed by Kerala Police led to this PMLA case, with ED’s Kochi unit spearheading the inquiry. The development has raised concerns over the group’s financial practices and investor trust.

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has interrogated George Alexander Muthoot, MD of the Muthoot Group. This action is part of an ongoing PMLA investigation into a major investor fraud case. The Sprouts News Investigation Team confirms the senior executive was summoned for questioning.

The probe stems from multiple FIRs originally filed by the Kerala Police. The Kochi ED zonal unit subsequently registered a money laundering case. This legal escalation underscores the seriousness of the alleged financial crimes.

Click Here To Download the News Attachment

The Alleged Investor Fraud Scheme

Branch managers of Muthoot Finance are the primary accused. They allegedly promised investors high returns between 8% to 12%. These returns were for specific fixed deposits and non-convertible debentures.

However, investor funds were secretly diverted elsewhere. Official sources state the money was funneled to Srei Equipment Finance Limited. This company was misrepresented as a Muthoot Group sister concern.

This misdirection led to a direct financial loss for investors. They faced non-repayment of their funds upon maturity. The police complaints allege this constituted a deliberate cheating scheme.

Also Read: GMC Jalgaon Doctor Assault Exposes Dean’s Absence, Security Lapses.

ED’s Money Laundering Investigation Intensifies

The Enforcement Directorate is acting under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). Their investigation seeks to trace the illicit fund trail. The goal is to identify the proceeds of crime from the alleged fraud.

George Alexander Muthoot’s statement was officially recorded by the agency. His deposition is a critical development in this high-profile case. The ED continues to investigate the depth of the financial diversion.

The case highlights rising regulatory scrutiny on financial institutions. It also raises questions about corporate governance and investor protection. The outcome could influence future financial sector regulations in India.

Controversies pf Muthoot Finance

Internal Fraud Case at Subsidiary

The most prominent recent issue involves a fraud case at Muthoot Insurance Brokers, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Muthoot Finance. In 2025, the company reported that its suspended CEO and a former employee of the parent firm were involved in the misappropriation of gift cards worth ₹11.92 crore (about $1.4 million) . These rewards from insurance companies were meant for distribution to employees . While the company stated there was no direct accounting loss, it projected a notional revenue loss of ₹31.28 crore due to potential business that was not generated . An FIR has been registered in connection with this fraud .

Past Operational and Transparency Concerns

An older investigative report from 2010 highlighted several operational concerns at Muthoot Finance branches . These issues raised questions about customer transparency and security practices:

Inconsistent Procedures: Branch practices contradicted advertised claims of granting loans within 3-5 minutes, with actual processes taking significantly longer .
Inadequate Security: Concerns were raised about the safety of pledged gold due to a lack of robust security measures and poor storage conditions at some branches .

Valuation Methods: The primary focus on the weight of gold jewellery, rather than its purity, for determining loan value was identified as a potential transparency issue .