The Kartik Bar and Restaurant case in Kalyan has come under scrutiny after a complaint raised concerns over property classification and licence compliance. The representation alleges that the premises, recorded as residential in municipal records, are operating as a bar under an FL-III licence. It also names Aaradhya Rajan Dubey and raises questions regarding alleged takeaway liquor sales. Authorities, including the excise department and civic bodies, have not issued official findings so far. All claims remain allegations and are subject to verification through inspection, documentation, and due legal process.
- Kalyan Kartik Bar case: Residential property tax records, FL-III licence use, and fresh scrutiny over compliance claims
- Questions raised over property classification and commercial use
- FL-III licence conditions and takeaway sales allegations
- Suspension period and undertaking claims under scrutiny
- Officials named and demanded regulatory action
- What happens next
Kalyan Kartik Bar case: Residential property tax records, FL-III licence use, and fresh scrutiny over compliance claims
A complaint concerning Kartik Bar and Restaurant in Kalyan East has raised questions over municipal land-use classification, excise licence conditions, and alleged takeaway liquor sales. Authorities have not publicly commented on the allegations.
The Kalyan Kartik Bar case has drawn attention after representations alleged that a premises assessed as residential in municipal tax records is operating as a bar and restaurant under an FL-III licence.
The complaint names licence holder Aaradhya Rajan Dubey and refers to the oversight responsibility of local excise officials, including Uattm Shinde, identified as Superintendent of Excise. No finding of wrongdoing has been made by any court or authority.
According to documents cited in the complaint, the establishment operates as Kartik Bar and Restaurant, licence number 2687, at property number D07007202400, near Patripull, near Shiv Sena Shakha, Kalyan East.
Questions raised over property classification and commercial use
The complaint states the property is recorded in municipal tax documentation as a residential unit, identified as Shop No. 01, House No. 168/1, Survey No. 13, opposite an Urdu school, Kalyan, Thane district.
It alleges that if the premises remain categorised for residential assessment, questions arise regarding whether separate commercial permissions, zoning approvals, or user-change clearances were obtained before hospitality operations began.
Municipal land-use permissions, occupancy classifications, and building approvals typically fall within the jurisdiction of the local planning and civic authority, including Kalyan-Dombivli Municipal Corporation (KDMC) where applicable.
No official KDMC response was included in the material reviewed by Sprouts News, and the status of any permissions could not be independently verified at publication time.
FL-III licence conditions and takeaway sales allegations
The representation further refers to an FL-III licence, commonly associated with on-premises service of liquor in bars, restaurants, and hospitality venues, subject to applicable state rules and conditions.
It alleges that liquor was also being sold through takeaway or parcel service from the premises, describing the activity as inconsistent with the conditions attached to that category of licence.
Whether any such activity occurred, and whether it violated licence terms, would depend on inspection findings, documentary records, and determinations by the Maharashtra State Excise Department.
The complaint identifies FL III – Kartik Bar and Restaurant – 2687 and again names Aaradhya Rajan Dubey as the licence holder linked to the premises.
Also Read: Adv. Smita Chiplunkar Flags PIB Rule Issue in the Assembly.
Suspension period and undertaking claims under scrutiny
The material also alleges that the licence had earlier been suspended between 18 March 2025 and 2 April 2025 over similar concerns. Independent confirmation of that suspension was not immediately available.
It further claims an undertaking was submitted before the Thane District Collector’s office, after which the licence was reportedly restored, with assurances of future compliance.
The complainant alleges that prohibited practices later resumed after restoration. Those assertions remain unverified unless confirmed by official records, inspection reports, or adjudicatory proceedings.
Neither the District Collector’s office nor the excise authorities had issued any public statement responding to the claims at the time this report was prepared.
Officials named and demanded regulatory action
The representation states that Uattm Shinde, described as the Superintendent of Excise, bears regulatory responsibility for ensuring licence compliance and enforcement within the relevant jurisdiction.
It calls for inspection of the premises, verification of municipal approvals, review of licence conditions, and action if any breaches are established under applicable excise or civic laws.
The complaint also references potential offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including provisions on cheating or conspiracy, though criminal liability can arise only after due investigation and legal process.
No criminal charges or court findings against the licence holder or any public official were cited in the material reviewed.
What happens next
The matter may now depend on whether municipal or excise authorities conduct inspections, seek records, or issue notices regarding zoning, taxation classification, or licence compliance.
If authorities decline action, complainants may pursue administrative appeals or file proceedings before the Bombay High Court, including a public interest litigation, subject to maintainability requirements.
As this remains an allegation-driven matter, all parties retain the right to respond. Sprouts News will update readers if official records or responses are received.
Readers’ Appeal:
Unmesh Gujarathi, an investigative journalist, has exposed several alleged scams, frauds, and public interest matters through sustained reporting. If you have credible information regarding any scam, fraud, corruption, or wrongdoing, contact the Sprouts News team at 9322755098.
Editorial Note:
This article is based on publicly available FIR records, court case references, and reports published by multiple media organisations. The information is presented in the context of ongoing investigations and public interest reporting. Sprouts News does not make any judicial determination regarding the individuals mentioned and does not intend to defame any person or organisation. Any individual seeking clarification or wishing to provide an official response may contact the editorial team with verifiable documentation. The information is presented for journalistic and informational purposes.
