Site icon Sprouts News

Delhi High Court Slaps Amazon with Rs. 340 Crore Penalty

Amazon

Amazon

• Cloudtail Confesses, Amazon Held Liable!

• E-Commerce Giants in Legal Trouble!

Unmesh Gujarathi
Sprouts News Network

In a landmark judgment, the Delhi High Court has directed Amazon to pay approximately Rs. 340 crore in damages to Lifestyle Equities, the proprietor of the ‘Beverly Hills Polo Club’ trademark, for unauthorized use of the brand’s logo on products sold through its platform.

The dispute traces back to 2020 when Lifestyle Equities CV initiated legal action against Amazon Technologies and associated entities. The lawsuit alleged that Amazon was manufacturing and distributing products under its “Symbol” brand, which bore a logo strikingly similar to the registered ‘Beverly Hills Polo Club’ emblem. Additionally, Cloudtail India, a significant seller on Amazon.in, was accused of retailing these infringing items.

In October 2020, the High Court issued an interim injunction, mandating Amazon and its affiliates to cease the use of the contested logo and remove the infringing products from their online marketplace. Despite these directives, Amazon Technologies did not participate in subsequent court proceedings, leading to an ex-parte decision against them.

By 2023, Cloudtail India acknowledged its involvement, admitting to using the disputed mark between 2015 and July 2020. The company reported revenues of Rs23,92,420 from the sale of these products, with an estimated profit margin of 20%. Cloudtail proposed a settlement and was open to a decree of injunction; however, mediation efforts did not yield a resolution.

Cloudtail’s legal representatives contended that any financial liabilities should rest solely upon them, referencing an Amazon Brand License and Distribution Agreement that purportedly assigned responsibility for such breaches to Cloudtail. Conversely, Lifestyle Equities argued that the infringing mark was not encompassed within this agreement and asserted that both Amazon and Cloudtail should be held accountable.

The court, while recognizing Cloudtail’s admission of liability, underscored that Lifestyle Equities deserved appropriate redress for the infringement of its intellectual property rights. Consequently, the court decreed that Amazon is obligated to compensate Lifestyle Equities with damages amounting to $39 million, approximately Rs340 crore.

This ruling serves as a significant precedent in the realm of intellectual property enforcement within India’s burgeoning e-commerce sector. It underscores the judiciary’s commitment to safeguarding trademark proprietors against unauthorized exploitation of their brands in the digital marketplace.

The Sprouts News Team is closely monitoring this development and will provide further updates as more information becomes available. This case highlights the imperative for e-commerce platforms to exercise rigorous oversight over the products offered by third-party sellers to prevent potential trademark violations. The Sprouts News Team will continue to report on the ramifications of this judgment for both online retailers and brand owners.

Amazon’s Trail of Controversies: Fraud, Manipulation, and Legal Battles

• Amazon has faced multiple controversies and allegations of fraud before this Delhi High Court ruling. The company has been accused of selling counterfeit products, manipulating search results to favor its private-label brands, and exploiting seller data to gain a competitive edge.

• In India, Amazon was previously under scrutiny for alleged violations of foreign direct investment (FDI) rules, where it reportedly favored select sellers like Cloudtail and Appario, indirectly controlling their inventory. Investigations also revealed that Amazon internally used confidential seller data to develop competing products, misleading customers and harming small businesses.

• Additionally, globally, Amazon has been accused of deceptive pricing tactics, fake reviews, and predatory pricing strategies that push out smaller competitors. These controversies highlight the growing concerns over Amazon’s business practices and its dominance in the e-commerce market.

Exit mobile version