A Mumbai Police complaint has been filed by multiple complainants alleging financial fraud involving Kashiff Khan, Shilpa Shetty, and Raj Kundra, along with associated entities. The complainants claim they were offered investment opportunities promising returns, but significant amounts remain unpaid. The representation has been submitted to the Mumbai Police and senior officials, seeking a detailed investigation. Authorities have not confirmed the allegations, and no official findings have been issued. The claims remain subject to verification, inquiry, and judicial review as the matter progresses.

Latest Mumbai Police Complaint Against Kashiff Khan, Shilpa Shetty, Raj Kundra: Fraud Allegations, FIR Claims and Key Demands

Multiple complainants have submitted a joint complaint to Mumbai Police alleging financial fraud, intimidation and delayed police action involving Kashiff Khan, Shilpa Shetty, Raj Kundra and SFL Pvt. Ltd. Authorities have not publicly confirmed the allegations.

A joint complaint submitted to the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai Police, raises fraud allegations against Kashiff Khan, Shilpa Shetty, Raj Kundra and associated entities, including SFL Pvt. Ltd.

The complaint, copied to the Joint Commissioner of Police (Crime), Deputy Commissioner of Police and a concerned Senior Inspector, seeks immediate investigation into alleged multi-state financial misconduct.

Complainants claim several victims invested money after being offered business proposals promising high returns, but substantial amounts allegedly remain unpaid despite repeated follow-up efforts.

One complainant alleged an unpaid amount of ₹1.59 crore, while the wider group claimed total losses running into crores across several investors nationwide.

The complaint was signed on behalf of the victims by Rajesh Tanwani and listed complainants, including Nitin Bharai, Rajesh Thakkar, Rajesh Chandan and Ashish Agarwal.

Prior complaints, FIR references and claims of delayed action

According to the representation, multiple complaints were previously filed before different police authorities, including Bandra Police Station, concerning similar allegations against those named.

The complainants also referred to an FIR allegedly registered around 2021 following a complaint by Nitin Bharai on related issues.

They alleged no substantial investigation or visible enforcement action had followed earlier complaints, prompting the fresh representation before senior Mumbai Police officials.

As of publication, Mumbai Police had not issued a public statement responding to the latest complaint or confirming details mentioned by complainants.

Sprouts News has not independently verified the status of earlier complaints, FIR records or the scope of any active investigation.

Kashiff Khan’s identity claims and alleged multi-state cases

The complaint alleged Kashiff Khan may have used multiple names, including Kashiff Sardar Hashim Khan Malik, Kashiff Hashim and Khan Malik Kashiff.

Complainants requested identity verification through passport, financial and official records, arguing the alleged use of multiple identities required closer scrutiny by investigators.

The representation further claimed Khan is currently lodged in Gorakhpur Jail and that a warrant was reportedly issued by Mulund Court.

Those assertions have not been independently verified through court records or official custody statements available at the time of publication.

The complaint also referred to alleged prior matters in Jaipur, Vadodara, Borivali and Pali Hill, including business-related raids and other criminal allegations.

It additionally mentioned Shyam Nagar Police Station, Bajaj Nagar Police Station and an alleged transfer to Vadodara police in an earlier case.

Also Read: Navi Mumbai Bank Fraud Raises Identity Misuse Allegations.

Related News: FTv Kashiff Khan case: Complaints Raise Absconding Fears.

Shilpa Shetty and Raj Kundra’s role cited by complainants

The complaint stated Shilpa Shetty and Raj Kundra had publicly denied involvement in company affairs linked to SFL Pvt. Ltd.

However, complainants alleged they had visited Raj Kundra and his office during the processing of transactions and relied on the company’s high-profile association.

They further alleged that the questioned business activities dated back to around 2014, while resignations reportedly occurred in 2015.

No documentary findings establishing wrongdoing by Shetty or Kundra were attached in the public version of the complaint reviewed by Sprouts News.

Both celebrities have previously faced unrelated public controversies, but no present legal conclusion can be drawn from allegations in this complaint alone.

Intimidation, social media claims and financial probe request

Victims also alleged social media posts created an impression of proximity to police or security personnel, which they said caused fear.

The complaint cited one alleged counter-complaint involving a person named Mukthair after visiting Kashiff Khan’s office, though independent verification remains pending.

Complainants requested the transfer of the matter to the Economic Offences Wing or a Special Investigation Team for coordinated action.

They also sought a forensic audit of SFL Pvt. Ltd., bank account analysis, fund flow tracking, beneficiary identification, and asset freezing.

Additional demands included a Look Out Circular, custodial interrogation, objection to bail and protection for complainants pursuing the matter.

What happens next

The complaint invokes provisions including cheating, criminal breach of trust, intimidation, and conspiracy under the Indian Penal Code, as cited by the complainants.

Any future action would depend on police assessment, documentary evidence, witness statements, financial records and findings from competent judicial or investigative authorities.

Until official confirmation emerges, the allegations remain claims made by complainants and should be treated as unproven assertions under due legal process.

Reader Appeal:

If you have information, documents, or personal experiences related to this matter, you may contact journalist Unmesh Gujarathi and his team at 9322755098. Verified tips, records, and victim accounts can help support factual reporting, public interest journalism, and deeper investigation into issues affecting readers nationwide.

Editorial Note:

This article is based on publicly available FIR records, court case references, and reports published by multiple media organisations. The information is presented in the context of ongoing investigations and public interest reporting. Sprouts News does not make any judicial determination regarding the individuals mentioned and does not intend to defame any person or organisation. Any individual seeking clarification or wishing to provide an official response may contact the editorial team with verifiable documentation. The information is presented for journalistic and informational purposes.