The Enforcement Directorate has arrested Bhubaneswar-based stone miner Ratikant Rout in an alleged money laundering case linked to illegal stone mining in Odisha’s Dhenkanal district. The agency said Rout had been questioned several times and that searches were conducted at properties linked to him during the investigation. The development has drawn attention because Rout previously complained against former ED officer Chintan Raghuvanshi, whose arrest by the CBI in 2025 followed allegations of demanding money in connection with Rout’s money laundering case.
ED Arrests Key Figure in Illegal Mining Money Laundering Case, Investigation Takes New Turn
More than a year after the arrest of former ED officer Chintan Raghuvanshi in a money laundering probe, the Enforcement Directorate has arrested Bhubaneswar-based stone miner Ratikant Rout, who had lodged a complaint that led to Raghuvanshi’s arrest.
Stone miner Ratikant Rout was arrested by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in a money laundering case related to illegal stone mining in Odisha. The development comes over a year after the arrest of senior ED officer Chintan Raghuvanshi after a complaint filed by Rout.
Ratikant Rout, officials said, is a businessman from Bhubaneswar who has mining interests in the Dhenkanal district. Sources said the ED had filed a money laundering case against him in 2024 on allegations of illegal stone mining operations.
Rout was called in for questioning several times during the course of the investigation, the agency said. ED officials also raided his properties in an attempt to collect evidence for the case.
Officials said the arrest came after they looked at material collected during the probe. Officials did not release any additional details about the evidence cited as the basis for the latest action.
Ratikant Rout Case Revives Focus on Earlier Chintan Raghuvanshi Arrest
The case has gained more prominence as Rout was also the complainant in a separate corruption case against Chintan Raghuvanshi, deputy director of the Enforcement Directorate in Bhubaneswar.
Rout had filed complaints against Raghuvanshi with the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on May 29, 2025. “The CBI laid a trap and arrested the officer based on the complaint.
The CBI’s First Information Report (FIR) said Chintan Raghuvanshi was allegedly caught red-handed with ₹20 lakh. The investigators described it as the first instalment of an alleged bribe deal involving Rs 50 lakh.
The FIR also said that initially, Raghuvanshi had demanded Rs 2 crore from Rout and later agreed to settle for Rs 50 lakh. The demand was allegedly made in connection with the miner’s money laundering case.
Officials had claimed the payment was demanded to save Rout from enforcement action in the ongoing probe. The charges were part of the CBI’s corruption case against the officer.
Also Read: Nalgonda Principal Murder Case: Blood-Stained Notes Lead to Two Teens.
Illegal Stone Mining Investigation and Broader Enforcement Implications
The recent step by the ED has put the initial money laundering investigation within the framework of suspected illegal stone mining operations in Odisha, especially in regions associated with Dhenkanal district.
Cases of illegal mining often attract the attention of enforcement agencies due to the financial and regulatory implications and environmental hazards they pose. Such investigations often include analysis of financial transactions, ownership records and business activities.
Legal experts say corruption and money laundering investigations can proceed separately, even if they involve the same individuals. Results in one case are not necessarily conclusive for conclusions in another investigation.
As for Chintan Raghuvanshi and the Ratikant Rout money laundering case, the matter is still under the legal process. It would be the courts ultimately assessing evidence from investigative agencies.
Sprouts News said the recent arrest is a significant development in a case that has seen the Central Bureau of Investigation and the Enforcement Directorate involved in the last two years.
Authorities have been combing through financial records and other evidence, and the investigation is likely to continue. The legal process is ongoing, and more revelations may emerge in the courts and in official statements.





















