Hops Kitchen & Bar FIR Under Fire for Evidence Manipulation.

FIR Manipulation Exposed: Evidence Tampering in Hops Kitchen and Bar Case

• Billing Records Directly Contradict Official FIR

• Timeline Inconsistencies Point to Deliberate Tampering

• Fabricated Evidence: Alcohol Type Incorrect in Police Report

An Investigation has exposed serious irregularities in the Hops Kitchen & Bar case, revealing that billing records directly contradict the official FIR’s details on date, time, and type of alcohol served. Evidence suggests deliberate tampering and manipulation of official records, allegedly influenced by the establishment’s owner to distort the investigation’s findings. Sources indicate that officers may have altered key evidence to shield the bar from legal accountability, undermining the integrity of the probe. The revelations have triggered calls for an independent inquiry into the police handling of the case, with advocates demanding transparency and accountability from both the law enforcement and excise departments.

Click Here To Download the News Attachment

Check the FIR copy – Click here

FIR Manipulation Exposed: Date, Time, and Evidence Tampered in Hops Kitchen & Bar Case

A Sprouts News Special Investigation uncovers grave discrepancies in an official FIR, pointing to evidence tampering and procedural sabotage.

A special investigation by Sprouts News has uncovered alleged manipulation of a First Information Report (FIR) concerning Hops Kitchen & Bar ( Lokhandwala Complex, Andheri- West, Mumbai). The establishment’s owner is accused of influencing the investigating officer to falsify crucial data. This act undermines the integrity of the entire legal process.

Billing Records Contradict Official FIR Timeline

The official FIR documents the offense date as October 15, 2025, at 10:30 PM. However, exclusive billing records obtained by our team tell a different story. A transaction receipt from Hops Kitchen & Bar is clearly timestamped October 16, 2025, at 12:31 AM. This direct contradiction in core timelines suggests deliberate evidence tampering. It raises serious questions about the investigation’s credibility from its inception.

Alcohol Consumption Details Fabricated in Police Document

Further inconsistencies emerge in the type of alcohol consumed. The FIR officially states that the beverage involved was Beer. Our investigation verified the original billing receipt. The document confirms the purchase was for Vodka, not Beer. This is a blatant fabrication of material facts within an official legal document. Such inaccuracies appear designed to mislead the judicial narrative.

Also Read: Madhya Pradesh Faces NCST Notice Over Tribal Surgeon Shortage.

Related Article: HOPS Kitchen & Bar Under Fire for Serving Minor.

Key Witnesses and Owner’s Name Omitted from FIR

Shockingly, the FIR completely omits the identity of the actual owner of Hops Kitchen & Bar. This is a major procedural violation in any establishment-related case. Equally alarming is the absence of the manager and staff members present during the incident. These critical omissions point to a coordinated effort to shield key individuals from scrutiny. It prevents a transparent and complete investigation.

Systemic Abuse of Authority and Call for Independent Probe

The pattern of data manipulation and omission indicates a systemic abuse of authority. It reveals a potential conspiracy to obstruct justice. The complainant has formally demanded an immediate independent inquiry. This probe must investigate the conduct of the involved police officer. It must also examine a possible nexus between the owner and investigating authorities.

A legal expert consulted by Sprouts News stated, “Law and truth cannot be compromised for personal gain. The deliberate alteration of facts in an FIR is a criminal act against justice itself.” This case highlights urgent concerns over procedural integrity. It underscores the need for heightened accountability within our law enforcement systems.