2 Thane Cyber Cops Held for Selling CDR's (Call Records) Illegally to Mohammad Sohel.

The Asaram Bapu Rape Case saw the Supreme Court decline immediate interim bail to self-styled godman Asaram Bapu while issuing notice on his appeal against the Rajasthan High Court judgment upholding his conviction. The Bench directed the Rajasthan Government to respond within three weeks and stated that interim relief may be considered later if his medical condition seriously deteriorates. The Court also ordered continuation of existing medical treatment. The criminal appeal remains pending, and the matter will be heard after the Court reopens following vacation.

Asaram Bapu Rape Case: Supreme Court Declines Immediate Interim Bail, Says Health Deterioration May Warrant Relief Later

The Supreme Court has declined to grant immediate interim bail to self-styled godman Asaram Bapu in the 2013 Jodhpur minor rape case. However, the Court observed that it may consider urgent relief later if his health condition seriously deteriorates after hearing the State.

The Asaram Bapu rape case witnessed another significant development on Tuesday after the Supreme Court refused to grant immediate interim bail to self-styled godman Asaram Bapu, while issuing notice on his appeal challenging the Rajasthan High Court judgment that upheld his conviction in the 2013 sexual assault case involving a minor devotee.

A Bench comprising Justice M.M. Sundresh and Justice Sheel Nagu sought a response from the Government of Rajasthan on the Special Leave Petition filed by Asaram Bapu, also known as Asha Ram @ Ashumal, against the Rajasthan High Court’s decision affirming his conviction.

The Bench clarified that it was not inclined to grant interim bail without first hearing the State or unless medical circumstances clearly justified such relief. The Court observed that it would consider interim liberty only if there was an absolute necessity to preserve the petitioner’s life.

The Fake GST Invoice case has come under scrutiny after Pearl Group CMD Ronnie Rodrigues filed a complaint seeking an FIR against M/s. Kazi & Associates and others are under investigation for alleged GST billing irregularities. The complaint alleges fraudulent Input Tax Credit (ITC) transactions, forged statutory documents, fake GST invoices, and financial misconduct connected with compliance services provided since 2013. According to the complaint, the alleged discrepancies surfaced after a GST officer's visit in June 2026. The allegations remain unverified and await investigation by the competent authorities.

Alleged Fake GST Invoice Case: Ronnie Rodrigues Seeks FIR Against M/s. Kazi & Associates Over Suspected ITC Fraud

Pearl Group of Companies CMD Ronnie Rodrigues has submitted a detailed complaint to the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Santacruz Police Station, alleging large-scale fake GST billing, fraudulent Input Tax Credit transactions, forgery, and financial irregularities, while seeking registration of a First Information Report against M/s. Kazi & Associates, its partners, and other concerned persons.

The alleged fake GST invoice case has come under police scrutiny after Ronnie Rodrigues, Chairman and Managing Director (CMD) of the Pearl Group of Companies, submitted a detailed complaint seeking registration of a First Information Report (FIR) against M/s. Kazi & Associates, its partners, and other persons allegedly connected with the transactions.

According to the complaint addressed to the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Santacruz Police Station, the allegations include preparation of fake GST billing invoices, fraudulent availment and utilisation of Input Tax Credit (ITC), forgery, cheating, criminal breach of trust, criminal conspiracy, and other offences that the complainant contends warrant investigation under applicable laws.

The complaint states that M/s. Kazi & Associates had been engaged as Chartered Accountants and tax consultants for several companies of the Pearl Group since 2013. Their responsibilities allegedly included GST compliance, Income Tax filings, statutory audits, regulatory filings, and various financial and taxation-related matters undertaken on behalf of the companies.

The ₹37 lakh recovery of a commercial payment dispute involving Ricky’s Bar & Kitchen has reached the Civil Court Senior Division, Thane. According to court records, a supplier has sought recovery of an alleged outstanding amount arising from supply transactions involving the establishment and associated individuals Ricky Ramesh Kishnani and Sanam Ramesh Kishnani. The matter remains pending adjudication, and no findings have been recorded on the merits of the allegations. Legal and business experts note that the dispute highlights the importance of credit risk management, vendor due diligence, documentation, and financial discipline in commercial transactions.

₹37 Lakh Recovery of Commercial Payment Dispute Reaches Thane Civil Court: Recovery Suit Highlights Credit Risk Concerns for Businesses

A commercial recovery dispute involving Ricky’s Bar & Kitchen, Ricky Ramesh Kishnani, and Sanam Ramesh Kishnani has reached the Civil Court Senior Division, Thane, over an alleged outstanding amount of approximately ₹37 lakh arising from supply transactions.

The ₹37 lakh commercial payment dispute involving Ricky’s Bar & Kitchen has reached the Civil Court Senior Division, Thane, drawing attention to the financial risks associated with credit-based business transactions and vendor management practices.

According to court records available in the matter, a supplier has approached the competent civil court seeking recovery of an alleged outstanding amount of approximately ₹37 lakh arising from supply transactions involving Ricky’s Bar & Kitchen.

The proceedings reportedly involve Ricky’s Bar & Kitchen and its associated persons, Ricky Ramesh Kishnani and Sanam Ramesh Kishnani. The matter has been registered before the 8th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Thane, and remains pending adjudication.

The Kashiff Khan case has regained attention following allegations relating to multiple identities, criminal complaints, and claims of association with FashionTV India. According to complainants and legal records cited in various proceedings, different name variations have reportedly appeared across business, court, and police documents. The matter also includes allegations connected to threats against journalist Dharmesh Hariram Thakkar and FIR No. 634/2021 registered at Juhu Police Station. The allegations remain subject to ongoing legal scrutiny, investigation, and judicial processes, with no final determination having been made by any court regarding the claims.

Alleged Fraudster Kashiff Khan Case: Multiple FIRs, Identity Allegations, FashionTV Claims and Criminal Proceedings Under Scrutiny

Alleged fraudster Kashiff Khan, who has described himself as associated with FashionTV India, faces scrutiny over multiple FIRs, alleged identity discrepancies, criminal complaints, and pending legal proceedings across several states.

The alleged fraudster Kashiff Khan's case has returned to public attention after a series of criminal complaints, court records, media reports, and allegations surfaced across multiple jurisdictions in India.

According to complainants and legal records cited by sources, alleged fraudster Kashiff Khan has allegedly used different names across documents, court filings, business records, and police proceedings.

Names attributed to him include Kashiff Sardar Hashim Khan Malik, Malik Kashif Khan, Kashif Khan, Kashif, Khasiff, and Kashif Sardar Hashim Khan.