Sprouts News Uncovers NFDC Scandal
• Favoritism and Flawed Hiring Revealed
• NFDC’s Governance Crisis Deepens
NFDC Scam: Questionable Appointments Undermine NFDC’s Integrity
• Tanmay Shankar – Head, Digital Growth:


Investigative Journalist
Founder & Editor-in-Chief, Sprouts News
Unmesh Gujarathi is an Indian investigative journalist and media professional with over 28 years of experience in print and digital journalism. He is the Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Sprouts News, an independent investigative publication headquartered in Mumbai, established in 2020.
Throughout his career, he has held editorial positions at leading media organisations, including:
DNA (Daily News & Analysis)
The Times Group
The Free Press Journal
Saamana
Dabang Dunia
Lokmat
His reporting has focused on investigative journalism, governance accountability, public policy, corruption, crime reporting and the Right to Information (RTI) framework in India.
As Editor-in-Chief of Sprouts News, he oversees:
Investigative direction
Editorial standards and verification protocols
Legal compliance and ethical review
Newsroom operations and accountability processes
Unmesh Gujarathi holds:
Master of Commerce (M.Com)
Master of Business Administration (MBA)
Degree in Journalism
His academic background supports his reporting in areas related to governance, financial systems, public administration and regulatory matters.
In addition to newsroom leadership, he is the author of more than 12 books in Marathi and English. His published works cover topics including:
The RTI Act and transparency mechanisms
Political leadership, including writings on Balasaheb Thackeray
Career guidance
Investigative journalism practices
He has contributed to national dailies and digital media platforms, focusing on evidence-based reporting and public-interest journalism.
Unmesh Gujarathi’s reporting methodology emphasises:
Documentary verification
Multi-source validation
Legal awareness in investigative reporting
Public-interest accountability
Under his leadership, Sprouts News has published investigative reports related to governance, regulatory oversight and institutional transparency.
Editor-in-Chief
Sprouts News
Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Phone: +91 9322755098
Email: unmeshgujarathi@gmail.com
Portfolio: www.unmeshgujarathi.com

21 June 2026
Continue Reading
20 June 2026
Continue Reading
31 May 2026
Continue Reading
16 May 2026
Continue ReadingFashionTV franchise allegations have widened after a Gorakhpur court rejected bail in a case involving Kashiff Khan Malik and investment disputes linked to F-Bar by FashionTV franchise claims.

Court proceedings in Gorakhpur and multiple investor complaints have intensified scrutiny around Kashiff Sardar Hashim Khan Malik, Krishna Hardik Shah, and franchise arrangements linked to the global FashionTV network.
The FashionTV franchise allegations have intensified after a Gorakhpur court rejected the bail application of Kashiff Sardar Hashim Khan Malik in proceedings linked to FIR No. 842/2025 registered at Ramgarh Tal Police Station. Investigators allege that investors were induced into investing substantial sums through promises connected to “F-Bar by FashionTV” franchise opportunities. Court observations referenced allegations involving forged agreements, misleading representations, and financial irregularities tied to hospitality ventures promoted under the FashionTV identity. Victims have additionally sought scrutiny of operational authority, franchise rights, financial flows, and alleged roles connected to Krishna Hardik Shah.
FashionTV Franchise Allegations: Alleged Fraudsters Kashiff Khan, Malik, and Krishna Hardik Shah Under Scrutiny
Alleged fraudsters Kashiff Sardar Hashim Khan Malik and Krishna Hardik Shah are facing serious scrutiny over the rights granted by global FashionTV founder Michel Adam Lisowski, reportedly linked to franchise investment disputes across India. The Gorakhpur court has rejected bail in the matter.
The issue drew renewed attention after the Court of the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 1, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, dismissed the bail application of alleged fraudster Kashiff Sardar Hashim Khan Malik. FIR No. 842/2025, registered at Ramgarh Tal Police Station, forms the basis of ongoing criminal proceedings.
According to the court order dated 8 May 2026, the prosecution alleges investors were induced into investing substantial sums on the promise of acquiring “F-Bar by FashionTV” franchise rights and associated hospitality business opportunities. Alleged irregularities include forged agreements, false representations, cheating, criminal conspiracy, and misappropriation of investor funds.
The court noted that forged signatures were reportedly used, investors were allegedly misled via franchise claims, multiple entities with similar branding were allegedly operated, and significant sums running into crores of rupees were collected from franchise seekers. The bail application was rejected due to the gravity of the allegations and evidence collected.
A Gorakhpur court rejected bail in the Fashion TV franchise fraud case involving allegations of forged agreements, criminal conspiracy, and disputed financial transactions exceeding ₹50 lakh.

Gorakhpur court rejected bail in a Fashion TV franchise fraud.
The Fashion TV Gorakhpur bail rejection case has gained attention after the Additional Sessions Court in Gorakhpur denied bail to accused Krishna Shah in Crime No. 842/2025 registered at Ramgarhtal Police Station. The case invokes multiple provisions under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and concerns allegations of organised financial fraud, forged agreements, and criminal conspiracy linked to an alleged F-Bar by the Fashion TV franchise arrangement. Prosecutors alleged that complainants were induced to transfer more than ₹50 lakh through promises of franchise rights and profit-sharing. The allegations remain subject to investigation and judicial proceedings.
Fashion TV Gorakhpur Bail Rejection Amid Fraud, Forgery Claims, and ₹50 Lakh+ Transaction Dispute
Court proceedings in Gorakhpur have brought into focus serious allegations of organised financial fraud, forged agreements, and criminal conspiracy linked to an alleged F-Bar by Fashion TV franchise arrangement.
The Fashion TV Gorakhpur bail rejection case has emerged as a significant legal development after the Additional Sessions Court, Court No. 01, Gorakhpur, rejected the bail application of accused Krishna Shah in connection with Crime No. 842/2025.
The matter, registered at Ramgarhtal Police Station, Gorakhpur, invokes multiple provisions under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), including Sections 336(3), 351(3), 61(2), 340(2), 338, and 318(4), indicating allegations of serious economic and criminal offences.
Court Records and Bail Rejection in the Gorakhpur Case
Patiala court records and MCA filings bring fresh scrutiny to the Kashiff Khan–Adam Lisowski network, with allegations of shell LLPs and disputed franchise operations under legal review.

Patiala court documents and MCA records cited in complaints raise questions around alleged franchise operations linked to Kashiff Sardar Hashim Khan Malik and Adam Lisowski.
The Kashiff Khan–Adam Lisowski network case has gained attention after Patiala court records and MCA filings were cited in complaints alleging irregularities in franchise operations. Documents linked to a 2016 FIR and a 2017 anticipatory bail plea highlight claims of misrepresentation and disputed authority in Fashion TV-linked ventures. MCA records show multiple LLPs with “F” branding formed in 2015, later marked as struck off. Complainants allege these entities were part of a broader operational pattern, though no final judicial determination has established wrongdoing. The allegations remain under legal scrutiny and subject to due process.
Patiala Court Records Expose Kashiff Khan-Adam Lisowski Network: Five F-Prefixed Shell LLPs, Forged Fashion TV Branding, Anticipatory Bail Denied
Court documents from Patiala have resurfaced as Kashiff Khan, Director of The K Group, faces escalating multi-state scrutiny, and fresh material now ties him directly to Austria-based Adam Lisowski, who has publicly operated under the alias “Michel Adam” since at least 1997.
Mumbai and Patiala legal records have renewed focus on Kashiff Khan and his long-time Austrian business associate Adam Lisowski as Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) records, court papers, and publicly circulated photographs collectively expose what complainants describe as a decade-long Fashion TV franchise fraud network operating under multiple shell entities.
The Patiala matter is one chapter in this longer documented chain. The court papers relate to a 2017 anticipatory bail proceeding tied to FIR 218/2016, registered after a local business owner alleged he was induced to part with more than ₹70 lakh under a proposed Fashion TV franchise arrangement. The bail order was passed by Additional Sessions Judge Shri Deepak Kumar Choudhary, who declined anticipatory bail relief sought by Kashiff Khan in the Patiala proceedings (CIS No. BA/354/2017).
Patiala FIR 218/2016 and the 2015 Franchise Agreement
Shilpa Shetty SFL FIR case returns to focus as old investment allegations and event references resurface, raising legal questions while claims remain unverified and subject to investigation.

Complaint narrative links Shilpa Shetty, Raj Kundra and Kashiff Khan to SFL franchise allegations; claims remain unverified.
The Shilpa Shetty SFL FIR case has resurfaced after complainants revisited earlier allegations linked to franchise investments and business representations. The complaint narrative names Shilpa Shetty, Raj Kundra, and Kashiff Khan in connection with a reported 2021 FIR. It also references past promotional events cited as part of the claims. However, no court has established criminal liability, and authorities have not issued final findings. Legal experts note that liability depends on evidence of involvement, making the matter subject to investigation, verification, and judicial scrutiny.
Shilpa Shetty SFL FIR case latest updates: 2014 investment allegations, 2016 event footage and legal questions revisited
A renewed complaint narrative links the 2021 Bandra Police FIR, earlier Super Fight League franchise claims, and 2016 public event footage featuring Raj Kundra and Kashiff Khan.
The Shilpa Shetty SFL FIR case has resurfaced after complainants cited archived material, alleging inconsistencies between later public denials and earlier business promotion activities.
Documents circulated to authorities reference an FIR reportedly registered in November 2021 at Bandra Police Station under Sections 420, 120B and 506 IPC.
The complainant was identified as Nitin Barai, who allegedly claimed he invested ₹1.51 crore in SFL Fitness for a Pune franchise.
Crime / Entertainment24 April 2026
Crime / Entertainment18 April 2026
Crime / Entertainment15 April 2026
Crime / Entertainment13 April 2026
Latest14 May 2025
Education / Exclusive13 June 2025
Business / Exclusive21 May 2025
Exclusive / Politics8 May 2025
Crime / Exclusive / Politics5 June 2025
Exclusive13 May 2025
Business / Exclusive / Politics15 May 2025
Business / Exclusive / Trending News9 May 2025
Crime / Entertainment24 April 2026
Crime / Entertainment18 April 2026
Crime / Entertainment15 April 2026
Crime / Entertainment13 April 2026
Latest14 May 2025
Education / Exclusive13 June 2025
Business / Exclusive21 May 2025
Exclusive / Politics8 May 2025
Crime / Exclusive / Politics5 June 2025
Exclusive13 May 2025
Business / Exclusive / Politics15 May 2025
Business / Exclusive / Trending News9 May 2025
Crime / Entertainment24 April 2026
Crime / Entertainment18 April 2026
Crime / Entertainment15 April 2026
Crime / Entertainment13 April 2026
Latest14 May 2025
Education / Exclusive13 June 2025
Business / Exclusive21 May 2025
Exclusive / Politics8 May 2025
Crime / Exclusive / Politics5 June 2025
Exclusive13 May 2025
Business / Exclusive / Politics15 May 2025
Business / Exclusive / Trending News9 May 2025