The K.M. Agrawal College controversy has gained attention after a complaint submitted by laboratory assistant Krishna Dinesh Singh sought an investigation into recruitment procedures, salary-related benefits, and administrative actions at the Kalyan-based institution. The representation raises questions regarding the appointment history of employee Ashokkumar Lalbihari Mishra and alleges irregularities in service-related approvals and salary fixation records. The complainant has also questioned a report submitted by Joint Director of Higher Education Dr. Kiran Kumar Bondar, alleging that key concerns were not adequately addressed. The allegations remain unverified and are subject to examination by competent authorities.

K.M. Agrawal College Allegations: Complaint Questions Report Submitted by Joint Director Dr. Kiran Kumar Bondar, Seeks Probe into Recruitment and Salary Records

Serious allegations concerning recruitment irregularities, salary disbursement, and administrative conduct at infamous K.M. Agrawal College in Kalyan have triggered demands for an official investigation. A complainant has also questioned a report submitted by Joint Director of Higher Education Dr. Kiran Kumar Bondar.

The K.M. Agrawal College controversy has drawn attention after allegations relating to recruitment procedures, salary payments, and administrative decision-making were formally raised before higher education authorities in Maharashtra.

According to representations submitted to the Higher and Technical Education Department, complaints have been made regarding the appointment and service-related benefits of employee Ashokkumar Lalbihari Mishra, along with allegations that certain officials attempted to suppress the matter.

At the centre of the dispute is Dr. Kiran Kumar Bondar, Joint Director of Higher Education, Panvel Region. The complainant has alleged that a report submitted to the Director of Higher Education, Pune, and the Principal Secretary of the Higher and Technical Education Department did not adequately address key concerns raised in the complaint.

Allegations Relate to Appointment and Salary Benefits

The complaint was submitted by Krishna Dinesh Singh, a laboratory assistant at K.M. Agrawal Arts, Commerce and Science College, Kalyan. His representation dated June 4, 2026, raises questions regarding the appointment history and salary-related benefits allegedly granted to Ashokkumar Lalbihari Mishra.

According to the complaint, Ashokkumar Mishra was appointed as a Laboratory Assistant on April 23, 1998. It has been alleged that the appointment was made without following prescribed recruitment procedures, including public advertisement, constitution of a selection committee, interviews, institutional approvals, and mandatory permissions.

The complaint further claims that Ashokkumar Mishra submitted his resignation from the Laboratory Assistant position on October 4, 2013, and that records indicate the resignation was forwarded to the office of the Joint Director.

Subsequently, Ashokkumar Mishra was allegedly appointed as Junior Clerk and Cashier on October 22, 2013. The complainant has alleged that the appointment was made without a fresh recruitment process, government approval, or the qualifications ordinarily required for the post.

Questions Raised Over Alleged Dual Benefits

According to the representation, documents prepared on June 26, 2023, allegedly sought to extend salary fixation benefits under the Seventh Pay Commission by treating Ashokkumar Mishra as a Laboratory Assistant despite the earlier resignation.

The complainant has alleged that benefits connected to two separate positions continued to be reflected in service-related records and that salary payments were drawn from government funds until March 2025. Sprouts News has not independently verified these allegations.

The complaint has called upon authorities to examine whether any irregularity occurred in relation to salary fixation, service records, and administrative approvals issued over the years.

Krishna Singh Challenges Claims About His Own Appointment

The dispute also involves allegations regarding the service status of complainant Krishna Dinesh Singh. According to the complaint, college authorities and officials have described his appointment as being against an excess or a mistakenly sanctioned post.

However, Krishna Singh has disputed those assertions, stating that his appointment followed the prescribed recruitment process. He has referred to an advertisement published in The Indian Express on July 23, 2014, interviews conducted by a duly constituted selection committee on November 18, 2014, and an appointment letter issued on November 25, 2014.

The complaint further states that his service records have been reflected in the HTE Sevarth system since the 2014-15 academic year and that a confirmation letter was issued on December 16, 2016.

Krishna Singh has also alleged that subsequent service-related actions against him were influenced by personal disputes arising after matrimonial proceedings involving the daughter of the late Dr. R. B. Singh, a former president of the institution.

Also Read: Parth Hospital Director Arrested in Pune Foeticide Probe.

Related News: K.M. Agrawal College Under Scanner Over Salary Scam.

Report Submitted by Dr. Kiran Kumar Bondar Under Scrutiny

A significant aspect of the complaint concerns a report allegedly submitted by alleged fraudster Dr. Kiran Kumar Bondar on May 29, 2026. According to Krishna Singh, the report focused on letters sent by the college administration on March 5 and March 6, 2026.

The complainant has alleged that the report did not adequately address issues relating to Ashokkumar Mishra’s alleged ineligibility, his reported resignation in 2013, or the allegations concerning salary and appointment benefits.

As a result, Krishna Singh has questioned whether the report diverted attention from the core allegations raised in his representation. These assertions remain allegations and are subject to verification through official inquiry.

Related News: Maharashtra Higher Education Offices Face Corruption Claims.

Related News: Panvel Higher Education Appointment Sparks Governance Debate.

Demands for Investigation and Current Status

In representations submitted to the Principal Secretary of the Higher and Technical Education Department and the Director of Higher Education, Pune, Krishna Singh has sought rejection of the disputed report and requested further action.

Among the demands made are a detailed inquiry into the role of Dr. Kiran Kumar Bondar, examination of alleged irregular appointments, scrutiny of service records, and initiation of appropriate action if violations are established under applicable laws.

At present, the matter remains at the complaint and inquiry stage. No final findings have been announced by the Higher and Technical Education Department, and no authority has publicly confirmed the allegations. All claims remain subject to administrative review, official investigation, and judicial proceedings wherever applicable.

Sprouts News made repeated attempts to contact Joint Director Dr. Kiran Kumar Bondar through phone calls and messages to seek his response to the allegations and issues raised in the complaint. However, no response was received from him at the time of publication. If Dr. Bondar provides his comments or clarification, his response will be incorporated in a subsequent update in accordance with principles of fair and balanced reporting.

Sprouts News will continue to monitor developments in the K.M. Agrawal College matter and report on any official findings, responses, or actions taken by the concerned authorities.

Readers’ Appeal

Readers possessing relevant documents, information, records, or perspectives relating to this matter may contact Senior Investigative Journalist Unmesh Gujarathi and the Sprouts News investigation team on 9322755098 for verification and further public-interest reporting. All credible information will be examined in accordance with journalistic and legal standards.

Editorial Note:

This article is based on publicly available FIR records, court case references, and reports published by multiple media organisations. The information is presented in the context of ongoing investigations and public interest reporting. Sprouts News does not make any judicial determination regarding the individuals mentioned and does not intend to defame any person or organisation. Any individual seeking clarification or wishing to provide an official response may contact the editorial team with verifiable documentation. The information is presented for journalistic and informational purposes.