The Madhya Pradesh Human Rights Commission has sought a detailed response from the state’s Medical Education and Public Health authorities over the alleged retention of original educational documents belonging to postgraduate doctors. The case, filed by Dr Divyansh Dwivedi, concerns thousands of doctors and raises questions about employment, further education and professional mobility. The proceedings also reference a 2021 National Medical Commission advisory stating that retaining original documents after postgraduate tenure is illegal and directing institutions to return them promptly.
MP PG Doctors Bond Case: MPHRC Seeks Response Over Retention of Original Educational Documents
The Madhya Pradesh Human Rights Commission has sought a detailed response from the Commissioner of Medical Education and Public Health in a petition alleging continued retention of original educational documents of postgraduate medical doctors. The proceedings could influence the implementation of rural bond policies across the state.
The Madhya Pradesh Human Rights Commission (MPHRC) has intensified scrutiny of the retention of original educational documents belonging to postgraduate (PG) medical doctors under Madhya Pradesh’s rural bond framework. The matter, which has reportedly affected thousands of doctors, is now under formal consideration following a petition filed by Dr. Divyansh Dwivedi.
Registered as Case No. 3963/2026, the proceedings involve S. Dhanraju, Commissioner, Medical Education and Public Health, Madhya Pradesh, who has been directed by the Commission to submit a detailed report. After reviewing the response, the Commission is expected to determine the next course of action.
According to records before the Commission, the dispute concerns the continued retention of original educational certificates of postgraduate doctors after completion of their academic tenure. Representations submitted to various authorities contend that the practice has affected thousands of doctors across Madhya Pradesh, raising concerns about employment, academic progression, and professional mobility.
To view the case-related documents - click here
National Medical Commission advisory strengthens scrutiny of PG doctors’ document retention
The issue has also reached multiple national regulatory bodies. Documents placed before the Commission indicate that the National Medical Commission (NMC) previously forwarded the grievance for examination while seeking an Action Taken Report (ATR) from the concerned authorities.
The case file further contains communications from the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, which forwarded representations concerning the matter to the National Medical Commission for appropriate examination. These communications form part of the official record currently under consideration by the Madhya Pradesh Human Rights Commission.
The proceedings assume greater importance in light of an advisory issued by the Post Graduate Medical Education Board (PGMEB) of the National Medical Commission on 9 August 2021. The advisory states that continued retention of original educational documents of postgraduate medical students after completion of their tenure is illegal.
The PGMEB advisory further directs institutions that no longer require the services of postgraduate doctors to relieve them promptly and return all original educational documents without unnecessary delay. The advisory has become a key reference point in representations challenging the existing administrative practice.
Also Read: ₹99 Lakh Medicover Hospitals Award Puts Clinical Records in Focus.
Human rights concerns highlighted before Madhya Pradesh Human Rights Commission
The matter has also been examined within a broader human rights framework. The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) recognises “Retention of Educational Documents” as a separate complaint category through its online human rights complaint management system, enabling affected individuals to seek intervention.
According to Dr. Divyansh Dwivedi, Dr. Awadhesh Pratap Singh, Chairman of the Madhya Pradesh Human Rights Commission, assured during a recent interaction that the Commission would issue a strong communication to S. Dhanraju, Commissioner, Medical Education and Public Health, regarding the issue.
Dr. Divyansh Dwivedi further stated that Dr. Awadhesh Pratap Singh observed that the National Human Rights Commission also considers retention of original educational documents a human rights violation, highlighting the seriousness with which statutory authorities view such complaints.
According to representations submitted before multiple authorities, thousands of postgraduate doctors across Madhya Pradesh continue to face professional hardship because their original educational certificates remain withheld pending compliance with rural bond obligations.
Without possession of their original educational documents, many doctors reportedly face difficulties accepting employment, pursuing super-speciality courses, completing professional registrations or joining other institutions. Petitioners argue that these restrictions significantly affect both career progression and access to professional opportunities.
Rural bond implementation may face wider policy review
Representations before the authorities further contend that continued retention of original educational documents has effectively become a coercive mechanism for enforcing compulsory rural service bonds. These submissions remain subject to consideration during the Commission’s ongoing proceedings.
Particular concern has also been raised regarding doctors admitted to private medical colleges who reportedly received no government scholarship or tuition subsidy but remain covered under the rural bond framework. Some representations further allege that certain bonded doctors worked for several months without receiving salaries while their original documents remained withheld.
The developments are expected to be closely monitored by postgraduate medical doctors, medical colleges, healthcare administrators and policymakers across Madhya Pradesh. The outcome of the proceedings before the Madhya Pradesh Human Rights Commission could have important implications for future implementation of rural bond policies and the longstanding administrative practice of retaining original educational documents, particularly in view of the Post Graduate Medical Education Board advisory and the National Human Rights Commission’s recognition of such complaints within its human rights framework. As the inquiry progresses, Sprouts News will continue tracking official developments, while the case is likely to remain significant for medical education governance and doctors’ professional rights across the state.
