The Maharashtra Pollution Control Board notice issued to Kanakia Paris Co-operative Housing Society Limited has intensified scrutiny over alleged environmental non-compliance, governance lapses, and disputed financial expenditure linked to sewage treatment operations. Residents allege the society’s STP remained non-functional despite regulatory requirements and claim that treated water contamination issues affected domestic supply systems. The controversy also involves disputed compliance spending exceeding ₹25 lakh, alongside allegations regarding inflated operational costs and weak oversight by office bearers. A Section 83 enquiry and additional regulatory proceedings are currently underway, while authorities continue examining environmental, financial, and administrative compliance concerns.

Kanakia Paris Environmental Scandal: MPCB Notice Raises Concerns Over STP and ₹25 Lakh Compliance Claims

A Maharashtra Pollution Control Board notice has intensified scrutiny of Kanakia Paris CHSL, where residents allege environmental lapses, financial irregularities, and governance failures.
Investigations now focus on expired permissions and disputed compliance spending.

MPCB Notice Highlights Alleged Environmental Failures

The Kanakia Paris Co-operative Housing Society Limited controversy deepened following a Maharashtra Pollution Control Board notice dated 27 January 2025, citing alleged non-compliance in sewage treatment, fire safety, and pollution-control systems. A follow-up Show Cause Notice was issued on 26 August 2025.

Residents claim that the society’s sewage treatment plant (STP) was non-functional, with an expired Consent to Operate since 31 October 2019. They allege that the developer handed over the property despite defective environmental infrastructure, raising significant regulatory questions. So many were the issues that STP water flow was merged in the Domestic Tanks, spreading significant water contamination as documented in minutes of society meetings. Despite the manipulation of minutes of meetings routinely, this fact could not be covered up by the Secretary and the office bearers.

To view the MPCB notices documents – Click here

Details from the MPCB Inspection

According to the notice, the STP was idle, filter presses were poorly maintained, and sludge-removal arrangements were inadequate. Treated water is reportedly discharged into MCGM drains rather than being reused for flushing or gardening.

The notice also cited missing online monitoring systems for pH, BOD, COD, and TSS, inoperative organic waste converters, and the absence of an ozonation system for swimming-pool water. Environmental risks include bacterial contamination, foul gases, unsafe recycled water, and sludge overflow.

Disputed ₹25 Lakh Compliance Spending (over spending ₹ 50 lakhs already done)

One contested aspect involves expenditure of approximately ₹25 lakh for pollution-control O&M. Residents claim actual expenses were below ₹2 lakh, questioning the allocation of the remaining ₹23 lakh. The society’s Secretary and Treasurer reportedly plan an additional ₹35 lakh spend, as recorded in the general body minutes. Already over ₹50 lakhs have been paid for STP Operations and now this ₹35 lakhs additional Treasurer and Secretary are pushing the envelope for. Section 83 Enquiry covered this point well.

The allegations suggest that these funds may have been used to conceal technical failures, inflate billing, or influence regulatory compliance management. Annual payments exceeding ₹9.6 lakh to intermediaries remain unverified and legally contested, according to residents as per section 83 Enquiry.

Also Read: Upstox Cuts Ties with Priti Rane Amid ₹500 Crore Probe.

Related News: Kanakia Paris CHSL Dispute Raises Questions Over SRA case.

Office Bearers Named by Residents

Residents have named Dr. Abhijit Warade, Secretary; Arvind Tibrewal, former Treasurer; Sundeep Dhargalkar, Treasurer and former Chairman; Nishant Vyas, Water Committee; and Prashant Chaudhari, former Secretary. Alleged lapses include approving defective systems, managing payments, and failing compliance oversight.

Dissenting residents report threats and reputational attacks. Sprouts News notes these are resident allegations requiring verification through official records, hearings, and lawful inquiry.

Related News: Kanakia Paris Row: 1,500 Residents Raise Health Concerns.

Regulatory and Legal Proceedings

A Section 83 enquiry has been ordered by Assistant Registrar Sandhya Bawankule, with the Secretary filing a revision application before a Joint Registrar bench headed by Abhijit Patil. Residents allege the revision aims to weaken the inquiry, though the claim remains subject to official determination.

Separately, the Fire Department reportedly initiated proceedings over fire-safety violations. Civic lawyers and officials allegedly missed hearings, delaying accountability.

Broader Implications for Governance and Compliance

The Kanakia Paris dispute raises questions about Mumbai’s luxury housing sector, including handover standards, infrastructure liabilities, and trust in management committees. Residents claim defects in environmental, plumbing, sensor, STP, and ozonation systems were inherited after paying premium prices.

Internal minutes reviewed by Sprouts News reportedly confirm that potable water lines were mixed with flush water, exposing residents to potential health risks. These lapses highlight the need for enforceable inspection standards, transparent audits, and stronger regulatory oversight. Even though the police are not able to take up the FIR despite multiple complainants signing the complaints, it needs to be examined for the motivation of the police for not taking action. Another claim is visible corruption in the MPCB, suggesting a consultant offering a license, sending notices and then not acting at all, making it a visible case of possible corruption.

Readers’ Appeal

Investigative journalist Unmesh Gujarathi and his team urge residents, whistleblowers, and concerned citizens to share verified documents, evidence, and information. Confidential tips may be submitted to his team at 9322755098 to support the ongoing investigation.

Editorial Note:

This article is based on publicly available FIR records, court case references, and reports published by multiple media organisations. The information is presented in the context of ongoing investigations and public interest reporting. Sprouts News does not make any judicial determination regarding the individuals mentioned and does not intend to defame any person or organisation. Any individual seeking clarification or wishing to provide an official response may contact the editorial team with verifiable documentation. The information is presented for journalistic and informational purposes.